@incollection{maio_iterative_2013,
	series = {Studies in Computational Intelligence},
	title = {Iterative, Incremental and Evolving {EAF-Based} Negotiation Process},
	copyright = {©2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg},
	isbn = {978-3-642-30736-2, 978-3-642-30737-9},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-30737-9_10},
	abstract = {Internally agents may use argumentation for both (i) reasoning about what to believe (i.e. theoretical reasoning) and/or (ii) for deciding what to do (i.e. practical reasoning). Despite existing differences between both, from a standpoint of first-personal reflection, a set of considerations for and against a particular conclusion are drawn on both [1]. On the other hand, concerning the types of agents’ dialogues (e.g. Deliberation, Negotiation, Persuasion, Inquiry, Information-seeking dialogues), while a clear distinction between each one exist, most of the agents’ dialogue occurrences involve mixtures of dialogue types.},
	number = {435},
	urldate = {2012-11-14},
	booktitle = {Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	author = {Maio, Paulo and Silva, Nuno and Cardoso, José},
	editor = {Ito, Takayuki and Zhang, Minjie and Robu, Valentin and Matsuo, Tokuro},
	month = jan,
	year = {2013},
	keywords = {Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics), Computational Intelligence},
	pages = {161--179}
}